Technical Managers Must Have a System

Original

In today's rapidly evolving tech industry, the role of a technical manager has surpassed the singular identity of a "technical expert." They have become drivers of team efficiency, implementers of business goals, and communicators of technology's value. The core enabler for this role to function effectively is not fragmented management skills or temporary solutions, but a complete, actionable, and iterative management system. Technical management lacking a system often falls into a cycle of "firefighting mode": resolving team collaboration conflicts today, dealing with project delay risks tomorrow, and handling accumulating technical debt the next day. This ultimately leads to manager burnout, stagnant team growth, and undermines the foundation of business development. Therefore, for technical managers, "building a system" is not an option but an essential core competency.

1. Why Technical Management Must "Have a System"?

The unique nature of technical teams dictates the necessity of a management system. On one hand, technical work is characterized by strong logic, high collaboration, and long cycles. From requirement breakdown and technology selection to development, testing, deployment, and maintenance, each phase needs seamless connection. Without a standardized process system, issues like "misunderstood requirements," "inconsistent code quality," and "frequent deployment failures" easily arise. On the other hand, technical teams have diverse talent structures: from junior engineers new to the industry, to senior experts deeply specialized in their fields, to technical leaders with strategic thinking. The needs and growth paths of personnel at different levels are vastly different. If a manager relies solely on "experience-based judgment" or a "one-size-fits-all" management approach, they will neither meet the skill development needs of junior engineers nor stimulate the innovative drive of senior experts, ultimately leading to increased team turnover.

From a business perspective, the value of technology is ultimately demonstrated by supporting business growth. If technical management lacks a goal system aligned with the business, it's easy for "technology and business to become disconnected." The technical team might focus on developing "features they assume are valuable," while overlooking the actual needs of the business, resulting in wasted resources. System-less technical management is, in essence, a waste of resources, talent, and business opportunities. Systematic management is the core lever for solving these problems.

2. What Core Systems Do Technical Managers Need to Build?

2.1 Goal and Alignment System: Synchronizing Technology and Business

The goal system is the "compass" of technical management, with the core purpose of achieving "deep alignment between technical goals and business goals." Specifically, managers need to establish a three-tier goal mechanism: the top level consists of "business-oriented goals," which clarify the core business metrics that technology needs to support; the middle layer comprises "technically decomposed goals," which translate business goals into actionable technical metrics; the bottom layer is "individual execution goals," where technical goals are broken down into personal KPIs or OKRs based on team members' capabilities and responsibilities.

To ensure goal alignment doesn't become a mere formality, managers need to establish a "regular synchronization mechanism": hold a weekly "Business-Technology Sync" where the business side communicates priority requirements and the technical side provides progress updates and identifies risks; conduct a monthly "Goal Review Meeting" to compare the completion status of business and technical metrics, analyze reasons for deviations, and promptly optimize the goal breakdown logic.

2.2 Process and Standardization System: Enhancing Collaboration Efficiency

The process and standardization system is the "skeleton" of technical management, core to solving the problems of "low collaboration efficiency and uncontrollable quality." It covers four main phases: requirement management, development management, quality assurance, and operations management.

In the requirement management phase, establish "requirement screening and breakdown standards": first, define clear requirement entry criteria to prevent "invalid requirements" from consuming resources; second, use "user stories + prioritization" to break down requirements, ensuring the development team understands the "user value behind the requirement," and use tools to synchronize requirement status to avoid information gaps. In the development management phase, the core is establishing a "standardized development process": from "requirement review, technical solution design, code development, code review, unit testing, to integration testing," each step should have clear responsible persons and delivery standards. For quality assurance and operations, establish a "full-chain quality monitoring and incident response system": on the quality side, cover core scenarios through "automated testing + performance testing + security testing" to prevent the recurrence of similar issues.

2.3 Talent and Growth System: Enabling Continuous Team Development

Talent is the "core asset" of a technical team, and the core of the talent system is "enabling every member to find a growth path while creating value for the team." Managers need to build the system across three dimensions: "capability assessment, development plans, and incentive mechanisms."

In the capability assessment dimension, establish a dual-dimension evaluation model covering "technical skills and soft skills": for technical skills, define level-based standards by role (e.g., front-end, back-end, testing, operations); for soft skills, focus on "communication skills, collaboration skills, and initiative in problem-solving."

In the development plan dimension, create "personalized growth paths" for members based on assessment results: for junior engineers, adopt a "mentorship + task-driven" model, assigning senior engineers as mentors, starting with basic skills like "code standards and issue troubleshooting," and achieving skill improvement through "completing tasks of increasing difficulty"; for mid-level engineers, provide development resources focusing on "technical depth + business understanding"; for senior engineers, emphasize the cultivation of "strategic thinking and team enablement" capabilities.

In the incentive mechanism dimension, avoid "focusing solely on performance," and establish a diversified system incorporating "material incentives, moral incentives, and growth incentives": materially, include "skill improvement, project contribution, and technical innovation" in performance evaluations; morally, recognize members' value through honors like "Monthly Tech Star" or "Quarterly Top Contributor"; in terms of growth, provide top performers with "promotion paths" or "opportunities to participate in core projects." A diversified incentive system can effectively stimulate team motivation.

3. Key to Building the System: Avoid "Formalism," Emphasize "Iterativeness"

For technical managers, the most common pitfall in building systems is "pursuing perfect form while neglecting practical effectiveness"; for example, establishing a talent assessment system without adapting the standards to the team's reality, rendering it a mere "box-ticking" exercise. Therefore, system construction must follow the principle of "taking small, quick steps and iterating continuously."

First, in the initial stage, the system should "focus on the core and simplify processes." For instance, processes and standards don't need to cover all aspects from the start. Begin with the two phases that most impact efficiency and quality, such as "requirement review" and "code review," establishing simple standards. Once the team adapts, gradually refine other areas. Second, establish a "system review mechanism" to regularly collect team feedback. Managers can use interviews and surveys monthly to understand the team's perspective on the existing system and adjust it based on business changes. Finally, managers must lead by example to drive system adoption. The vitality of a system lies in its execution. If managers themselves do not follow the processes or do not value the talent system, the system will ultimately fail. Therefore, managers need to become "practitioners" of the system. They should take the lead in analyzing their own shortcomings during goal reviews, invest time and effort in talent cultivation, and guide the team through their own actions to foster an atmosphere that "respects and relies on the system."

4. Conclusion

The essence of technical management is to connect "technology, talent, and business" through a systematic approach, achieving a "1+1+2" effect. For technical managers, building a system is not a one-time task but a process of continuous refinement. It requires managers to possess both a "strategic perspective," enabling them to anchor the long-term goals of the business and the team, and "execution capability," allowing them to translate abstract systems into actionable details. Furthermore, it requires an "iterative mindset" to constantly optimize and adjust based on changes. When technical management is supported by a system, managers can free themselves from "trivial tasks" and focus on more valuable strategic thinking; teams can shift from "passive execution" to "active creation," achieving sustained growth; and technology can truly become the "core driver" of business growth, rather than just a "support tool." Therefore, every technical manager should remember this: only through systematization can one proceed steadily and go far.