On the Decision Criteria for Product End-of-Life (EOX)

Original

Within an enterprise's product management system, Product End-of-Life (EOX) is not merely the simple withdrawal of products from the market and discontinuation of production. Rather, it constitutes a systematic decision involving multiple dimensions such as market dynamics, financial performance, technological capabilities, and customer experience. Scientific EOX decision-making not only enables enterprises to stem losses in a timely manner and avoid resource waste but also safeguards customer rights and interests while laying the groundwork for new product iteration. By integrating industry best practices and tool applications, this paper systematically outlines the core decision criteria for product end-of-life and provides enterprises with a practical reference framework.

1. Core Scope and Management Value of Product End-of-Life

End-of-Life (EOX) management primarily encompasses three key milestones, often referred to as the "three stops": End of Marketing (EOM), End of Production (EOP), and End of Service (EOS). These three nodes are interconnected, collectively forming a complete chain for a product's withdrawal from the market. In practice, the absence of a standardized decision-making mechanism often leads enterprises into the dilemma of either "failing to withdraw when necessary" or "prematurely eliminating products." Consequently, they may either allow unprofitable products to continuously drain resources or trigger customer complaints due to abrupt withdrawal.

Taking the field of project management as an example, throughout its 16-year evolution, ZenTao has consistently adhered to the principle of "phase-matched decision-making." For its early open-source tools, the EOM process is initiated only when market feedback indicates that the functionality fails to meet enterprise-level requirements and the proportion of users migrating to the flagship version exceeds 80%. During the EOP phase, server deployment numbers are counted six months in advance to ensure that core component inventory can cover demand throughout the transition period. For EOS decisions, technical support capabilities are thoroughly evaluated; official termination of support occurs only when no member of the maintenance team possesses proficiency in the old version's code and the volume of customer service requests falls below one per month. This rigorous decision-making logic not only prevents resource waste but also ensures a quality user experience.

From an industry value perspective, standardized EOX decisions can achieve three key objectives: first, financial optimization—by phasing out low-margin products, enterprises can concentrate R&D and production resources on high-potential business lines; second, customer retention—through well-defined transition planning, users are guided to smoothly migrate to alternative products; third, strategic focus—it assists enterprises in divesting non-core businesses to align with long-term development directions. This rationale underpins ZenTao' expansion from a single open-source tool into enterprise, flagship, and IPD editions.

2. Stage-Specific Decision Criteria for Product End-of-Life

EOX decisions should be implemented progressively following the sequence of "EOM-EOP-EOS." Each stage requires clearly defined quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria, supported by cross-departmental data to prevent decision-making bias arising from single-dimensional assessments.

(1) End of Marketing (EOM): Dual Triggers Based on Market and Financial Dimensions

EOM constitutes the initial phase of product exit, with the core objective of maximizing total product lifecycle revenue while minimizing inventory backlog. EOM decision-making should center on "routine monitoring indicators" and "problem analysis indicators": the former serve for dynamic early warnings, while the latter aid in root cause tracing.

For routine monitoring indicators, benchmarks established in the pre-launch ADCP report (the final decision review report) serve as the baseline. An initial EOM assessment is triggered when any indicator falls below its respective baseline. For instance, regarding an older test management module of ZenTao, if the ADCP projected a "gross profit margin" of 35% but actual operations recorded a decline to 28% for three consecutive quarters, coupled with a drop in the "product return on investment" from an expected 15% to 8%, the evaluation process would be initiated. Additionally, the "number of major quality incidents" represents a critical threshold: if a version experiences more than two incidents of customer data loss due to vulnerabilities, sales strategies must be re-evaluated even if financial metrics are met.

Problem analysis indicators, in contrast, do not require fixed thresholds. They are utilized during the EOM report preparation phase to identify the "root cause of product decline." For example, when the ZenTao team assesses whether to discontinue sales of a mobile application, it analyzes indicators such as "market share" (whether it is being eroded by competing tools), "customer issue density" (whether crash-related complaints exceed the industry average), and "supply chain inventory turnover rate" (whether installation package downloads show a persistent decline). Identifying "user preference for integrated PC functionality" as the primary reason ultimately justifies the EOM decision.

It is important to emphasize that EOM decisions must be fully integrated with subsequent product planning. If a replacement product is nearing launch (e.g., ZenTao plans to release a new version featuring AI testing capabilities), EOM should be initiated three to six months in advance. Strategies such as "discounted upgrades for existing users" can then be employed to facilitate a smooth sales transition and prevent conflicts between old and new products.

(2) End of Production (EOP): Coordinated Assessment Involving Supply Chain and Replacement Products

EOP decisions focus on "containing losses in production," aiming to avoid waste of production capacity and materials while fulfilling residual market demand. The evaluation criteria primarily encompass three dimensions: "progress of replacement products," "supply of critical materials," and "production economics."

An EOP assessment may be initiated when a subsequent or replacement product is nearing launch (e.g., the ZenTao IPD version has completed beta testing and is scheduled for official release within two months) and the "proportion of old-version products" within market orders falls below 10%. EOP should also be accelerated if critical components face supply disruption risks or if supplier demands lead to a substantial increase in production costs. Furthermore, a "prolonged absence of shipments" serves as a significant indicator: if a product records no new orders for six consecutive months and its inventory digestion period exceeds 12 months, continued production would immobilize capital, necessitating a prompt halt in production capacity.

In its EOP management, ZenTao incorporates a "cross-version material reuse" approach. For digital materials such as installation packages and user manuals from older software versions, the company evaluates their potential for modification and reuse in new versions. For hardware like physical servers, strategies such as "depreciation and reuse" are applied to reduce costs. This meticulous management approach epitomizes the core value of EOP decision-making.

(3) End of Service (EOS): Balancing Technical Support and Customer Needs

EOS represents the final phase of product exit, directly impacting customer rights and necessitating a balance between "service costs" and "customer experience." Its decision criteria can be categorized into three areas—"financial feasibility," "technical support capability," and "platform compatibility"—each with established quantitative thresholds.

Financially, the "service gross profit margin" is a core indicator. While the industry standard is typically around 40%, continued service becomes unsustainable when this metric falls below 10%. Technically, it is crucial to assess whether the capability to provide adequate support still exists: if the product's core technology is severely outdated, continuing service entails high risks. Platform compatibility is equally critical; incompatibility with internal support systems due to product obsolescence, leading to severely degraded service response times and customer satisfaction, makes an EOS decision imperative.

It is noteworthy that EOS does not entail an immediate and complete termination of service. Instead, a structured transition period must be established. ZenTao typically issues an EOS announcement six months in advance, offering existing customers solutions such as "free migration guidance" and "discounted extended maintenance" until all paying clients have completed their upgrades, before officially ceasing service channels. This approach effectively mitigates customer churn.

3. Implementation and Tool Support for Product End-of-Life Decisions

A scientific EOX decision framework relies not only on well-defined criteria but also on cross-departmental collaboration mechanisms and digital tools to ensure its efficient and controlled execution.

At the implementation level, it is essential to establish a lifecycle Management Team (LMT) comprising representatives from marketing, finance, supply chain, R&D, and service departments. The team should operate according to a four-step process: Data Collection, Comprehensive Assessment, Plan Formulation, and Execution Monitoring. Taking the EOM decision for a specific ZenTao version as an example: the marketing representative within the LMT collects regional sales trends and channel inventory data; the finance representative calculates profit variations over the past three years; the supply chain representative assesses material availability; and the R&D representative evaluates the replacement capability of the new version. This collaborative effort culminates in an EOM Decision Report. Such cross-functional collaboration mitigates the limitations of unilateral decision-making by a single department, thereby ensuring comprehensiveness.

Tool support is crucial for effective decision implementation. The ZenTao project management software itself can serve as a platform for managing EOX decisions. For example, its Requirement Management Module can track the development progress of replacement products; the Project Time Management feature can calculate the maintenance costs of legacy products; and the Bug Management system can monitor customer issue density. Moreover, its Custom Reporting functionality can visualize the core metrics for EOM, EOP, and EOS, enabling managers to monitor implementation progress in real time. During the EOP execution phase, for instance, the Inventory Management module can be configured to trigger alerts when stock levels fall below a safety threshold, prompting a production halt to prevent waste.

Additionally, a dynamic adjustment mechanism must be established post-implementation. For example, if stable orders persist in a specific region after initiating EOM, the sales transition period may be appropriately extended. Conversely, if urgent customer needs arise after EOS, an Emergency Service Channel can be activated. In one instance, after a ZenTao version reached EOS, the company provided three months of temporary technical support to a key customer. This flexibility not only resolved the customer's urgent issue but also preserved the long-term partnership, exemplifying the important complementary role of adaptability within EOX decision-making.

Product End-of-Life should not be viewed as a "signal of failure" but rather as an inevitable strategic choice for enterprises to optimize resource allocation and focus on core strategies. The decision-making process must be data-driven, uphold customer experience as a baseline, and be executed progressively across multiple dimensions. Concurrently, it must leverage cross-departmental collaboration and digital tools to ensure effective implementation.

For enterprises, establishing a standardized EOX decision-making system not only mitigates product exit risks but also frees up resources and creates space for new product iterations. Just as ZenTao evolved from a single open-source tool into a comprehensive management platform covering the entire R&D lifecycle, scientific EOX decisions have consistently served as a crucial enabler of its strategic advancement. Looking ahead, with intensifying market competition and accelerating technological change, EOX decision-making will become a core reflection of an enterprise's product management capability. Only by precisely determining the right time to exit can a company sustain its competitiveness in a dynamically evolving market.